Another Amateurish, Embarrassing, and Error-riddled WSJ Editorial
Wednesday, July 1, 2009 at 11:58 pm
I guess I expected some of the nutburgers at FAUX News to go into full apoplexy mode with the announcement that the Minnesota Supreme Court has upheld Senator Elect Al Franken’s victory over Sen. Norm Coleman. I haven’t been disappointed.
What surprises me a little is, yet, another embarrassingly amateurish unsigned editorial from The Wall Street Journal. The editorial is ladened with irrational emotional charges and riddled with factual errors. And this editorial make the fourth such embarrassingly poor editorial on this topic.
The editorial goes off the deep-end, misunderstanding the nature of recounts, election challenges, and Minnesota election law. Instead they throw out the cowardly “stolen election” like some childish Wingding, never offering any serious evidence for a stolen election.
Where it gets personal for me, however, is the mischaracterization of the 2004 Washington state gubernatorial election:
This is now the second time Republicans have been beaten in this kind of legal street fight. In 2004, Dino Rossi was ahead in the election-night count for Washington Governor against Democrat Christine Gregoire. Ms. Gregoire’s team demanded the right to rifle through a list of provisional votes that hadn’t been counted, setting off a hunt for “new” Gregoire votes. By the third recount, she’d discovered enough to win. This was the model for the Franken team.
Huh…I followed that election pretty damn carefully. There were many interesting and complex issues in the Gregoire–Rossi election, recount and court challenge. But “rifl[ing] through a list of provisional voters” had nothing whatsoever to do with Gregoire’s victory.
And there was no “third recount.” There were only the two recounts prescribed by Washington state law: a mandatory recount, and the single “requested” recount.
Now that I think about it, this WSJ editorial, isn’t even written to the level of a bad blog post. It is more akin to the kind of anonymous comments that inevitably show up in newspapers and political blogs. Perhaps these guys just need to lay off reading comment threads for awhile.



